Information Security and Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Information Security and Ethics - Essay Example Professional ethics plays crucial role in helping information security professional to execute their duty. However, to ensure maximum information security, organizations need to institute relevant legislations to guard against information security breach. This paper explores policies and procedure that organizations should implement to secure their confidential information. It is crucial that security forms an integral part of organizational culture. Protecting the firm from possible information security breach should be a major focus of the company’s operational process. To achieve this, security policies or e-policies provide the fundamental framework for an organization to beef security over its crucial information. Security policies are regulations that outline how organizational information are supposed to be used in executing daily organizational tasks and also dictate who is authorized to access what information. What Are Security Policies or e-policies? A security poli cy can be referred to as a document that gives guidelines on how an organization intends to protect its physical as well as information technology assets. According to Ciampa (2010), a security policy refers to â€Å"a document that outlines the protections that should be enacted to ensure the organization’s assets face minimal risks.†An organization’s security policy is usually referred to as a living document because it is continuously upgraded to meet emerging organizational challenges in the face of organizational change and evolving employee requirements. The security policy of an organization usually reflects on policy implementation requirements and possible corrections in case loopholes are detected (Ciampa, 2010). Recommended Information Security Policies for Organizations Control over Access to Computer Rooms In order to ensure high level security for crucial organizational information, computer rooms should be kept under lock and key at all times. Com puter rooms should have doors fitted strongly and manned by security officers at all times. In addition to locking computer rooms, there should be security officers deployed to man the doors to main information areas. Only authorized personnel should access such rooms through user authentication process. Use of Passwords and Authentication Procedures The organization should have documented guidelines to control access over its crucial information areas. All computers in the organization should have passwords in relation to security demands. These guidelines need to be assessed on regular intervals. The guidelines should have password requirement and control the storage of such passwords. All users of information accessing information system of the company must be authenticated. Individuals who are authorized to access company information should have unique blend of usernames and passwords to bar unauthorized personnel or external intruders from gaining easy access to the organizatio n’s private information. Information users are held responsible for the usage of their passwords and usernames, which they should keep secret unless called upon by the chief security officer to disclose such passwords and usernames. Data Encryption Policy The second policy that an organization can establish to protect its valuable information is data encryption. In recent times, there have been numerous

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.-Jurist and his particular relevance in the Essay

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.-Jurist and his particular relevance in the world of Jurispudence - Essay Example His biggest achievement associated with justices was the elimination of the legal and official reasoning, which were actually supported by the philosophy of natural law and natural right (Watson). Historical Context Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. originally came from Boston and was a student of Harvard College. During his academic life, he participated in the Civil War of 1857, which had a great impact on his life and perceptions of the law and ultimately leaded him to join the Massachusetts Bar in 1867 after graduating from the Harvard Law School. He served in the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts till 1902, after which he joined the Theodore Roosevelt Supreme Court, where he remained held the position for about twenty-nine years. In addition to being associated with the judicatory, he was also a successful and renowned writer. Wendell and Jurisprudence Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. had the following basic visions and outlooks about the Jurisprudence (Watson): He convinced people tha t Law is basically sustained by the experience rather than logic as experience makes its life longer whereas logic at times is left behind. Apparently, he was the supporter of judicial control when the conventional judicial advocacy was targeted and condemned by the system of liberal activities. He induced the thought of realism in to the Court by introducing the concept of forecasting. He compelled people and lawyers to see law from other dimensions, that is, of the dreadful man and how he was convinced to break the law. He also proposed his arguments pertaining to positivism as opposed to ethical language in law. Wendell has also made significant contributions to the Pragmatic Approach of Jurisprudence, which was actually founded by him as he was the member of Harvard related club initiated by John Dewey. He was a person who used to keep a close eye on the consequences and results of a potential idea. He used to analyze things with exceptionally experiencing outlook as far as law and jurisprudence were concerned. He thoughtfully expressed this idea in his book The Common Law. He had a great emphasis over the external factors in the matters of court rather than the internal ones. Through his writings and expressions he demonstrated a strange dimension of philosophy of law, especially in the area of jurisprudence. He wanted to liberate the law from the restraints to the way of formality and automatic frame of deductive thinking. To do this, he applied the mechanical, experimental, experiencing and consequential approaches also known as ‘pragmatic maxim’ to the principles of law (Watson). Wendell had a distinctive thinking about law and jurisprudence. Previously he had a close relationship with the natural law and natural rights, which encouraged him to maintain a close eye on the consequences of law and jurisprudence. He considered that values and morals did not have a strong relationship with the proceedings of court. The right and wrong aspects attached to the cases presented in courts are not based upon the purposeful standards, which makes their significance very low. The law differentiates between the good and bad or the culprit and the innocent on the basis of prevailing norms of the society, which in reality do not have any affiliation with the constitution. The realistic approaches of Wendell denied the existence of constitutionalism. By the end of the Civil War, pragmatism had already founded its way into law and jurisprudence superseding the concept of natural law and n